This post is a complement to the grassroots vs. ivory towers discussion. In the previous post, James mentioned two trends of realizing the dream of the Semantic Web. While the grassroots way encourages the wider adoption of the Semantic Web, the ivory-tower way stimulates the construction of Semantic Web standards. Besides all of these, these two sides indeed play different roles in weaving the Web — the destiny of web evolution.
17 results for web evolution
The discussion of semantic search has gradually become popular. Just not long time ago, semantic search was thought to be barely a little bit more than a dream. At present, optimistic researchers have started to believe its possibility in the near future. Very recently at Read/WriteWeb, Dr. Riza C. Berkan, the CEO of Hakia (a company declared to perform "semantic search"), posted an article about semantic search that attracted much attention. Despite of agreeing with the post, here are more thoughts about semantic search.
Published 9 years ago by Yihong Ding
There is a contradiction. The dream of the Semantic Web is beautiful, but few people are willing to realize it initiatively. The reason is primarily due to the pitiful nature of the selfishness of mankind; we prefer to enjoy contributions from others rather than contributing to others in the first hand. Some pessimistic ones of us, such as Stephen Downs and Mor Naaman, had even sentenced the Semantic Web to death due to this reason. Others of us, however, also cannot avoid but only try to solve this contradiction, actively and optimistically.
Published 9 years ago by James Simmons
The most pertinent issue surrounding the Semantic Web is why it has not yet gained strong traction from the development community. First, when I say grassroots I'm referring to the initiative of people like you and I to create the Semantic Web from the bottom-up. The ivory towers is the W3C and their initiative to create the Semantic Web. Both groups are pivotal to the acceptance and adoption of new standards and technologies. Without grassroots initiatives we would not have adoption and without the W3C we would not have standards (which we all have learned the Web most certainly requires).
Lately we've been talking a bit about Web evolution, and right now we're tossing back and forth the idea of grassroots vs. ivory towers. In that entry I described the belief Yihong and I have that the grassroots (developers) will need to take the reins so to speak from the ivory towers (W3C, purely academic research, etc) in order to ensure its adoption.
Yihong Ding (contributing author of this blog) has posted the fourth installment to his thought provocing series A View of Web Evolution. In this installment Yihong states that there exist natural mappings between the stages of web evolution and the stages on human growth. He goes on to describe the life stages of web nodes beginning with Web 1.0 nodes as newborn babies, Web 2.0 nodes as pre-school kids, and Semantic Web nodes as educated children.
The entire series is an engaging read and I suggest to everyone that hasn't already read it to do so!
More and more people are starting to discuss the Semantic Web, but few truly understand how it is different from the traditional World Wide Web. Though the Semantic Web will be realized as a layer upon the current Web, some of their basic philosophies are going to be updated significantly. This post tries to list some truth about the Semantic Web that is critical but often overlooked.
Richard McManus of Read/Write Web just posted an insightful list of future web trends. I like this list for three reasons:
- The Semantic Web is listed as the #1 future Web trend
- Richard is a huge player in Camp Web 2.0
- I agree with every item on the list (though not necessarily what was said about them)
I recently read on Network World that Gartner's David Mitchell Smith said "There are a lot of constituencies trying to hijack the term Web 3.0." I don't think I like Web 3.0 just yet, do you? I agree with the Gartner representative that Web 3.0 wreaks of marketing hype, and in my opinion it is a race by people that felt left behind by the Web 2.0 movement. Vendors pushing the term Web 3.0 are advocating the rise of the Mobile Web, virtual worlds, and the Semantic Web. I agree that all of these technologies will take rise, but I don't agree that we should call that era "Web 3.0."
Published 8 years ago by James Simmons
Yihong Ding released the 10th and final installment to his series A View of Web Evolution. In the final installment of the series Yihong poses the question of how we will know when we've finally reached the next stage in Web evolution.
semantic, semantic web search, microsoft semantic web, semantic web blog, semantic focus, semantic web search engine, semantic web problems, semantic cms, semantic web search engines, semantic web, semantic web blogs, camp semantic, semantic web layer cake, natural language processing blog, semantic web microsoft, sparql php, semantic blog, natural language search, true knowledge, eswc 2009, object oriented web, protege tutorial video, rdf tags, introduction to semantic web, php sparql, microsoft rdf, microformats rdf, semantic web conference 2008, owl semantic web, problems with semantic web, rdf vs microformats, cody burleson, protege tutorial, rdf search engine, microformats vs rdf, rdf microformats, semantic web tutorial, semantic web conference 2009, rdf blog, eswc 2008, graphd, rdf microformat, semantic web rdf, blog semantic web, semantic web conference, european semantic web conference 2009, dbpedia freebase, web service life cycle, semanticfocus, python sparql, problems in semantic web, swoogle, curse of knowledge, semantic web introduction, semantic web issues, statistical search, semantic web layers, semantic web vision, twine blog, semantic web podcasts, owl videos, rdf tagging, semantic web natural language processing, arc rdf, falcons search engine, protege 4 tutorial, web videos, european semantic web conference 2008, semantic search engine, semantic web community, semantic web tutorials, semantic natural language processing, semantic web problem, semantic web videos, microformat rdf, natural language processing semantic web, web search engines, open calais, problems with the semantic web, rdf tag, semantic web cake, web thread, tower of babel, bin laden, rdf microsoft, semantic web technology stack, natural language processing blogs, natural language question answering, rdf owl, protege screencast, semantic web logo, problems of semantic web, information extraction blog, microformat vs rdf, protege video tutorial, domain knowledge, james simmons, seesaw effect, semantic search, semantic web references, the curse of knowledge, web 3.0 ideas, web semantic, blog semantic, cms tags, question answering, semantic web games, semantic web technology, aditya thatte, rdf video, spanish semantics, web evolution, data storage in oracle, different from, freebase rdf, microsoft and semantic web, problems semantic web, rdf vs microformat, web search engine, what is true knowledge, freebase dbpedia, jamie lewis blog, question answering wikipedia, semantics, web service ontology, zitgist, freebase linked data, introduction to semantic web vision and technologies, ontology blog, owl introduction, protege semantic, selfishness, semantic update, semantic web protege, focus semantics, freebase vs dbpedia, microformats and rdf, microformats vs, microformats vs semantic web, owl tags, protege semantic web, search engine semantic web, semantic web owl, altova tutorial, backlinks blog, calais initiative, eswc 2008 semantic, protege, semantic web microformats, semantic web research topics, semantic web technologies, arc semantic, natural language semantic web, oracle semantic web, owl semantic, problem with semantic web, rdf, semantic web layer, semantic web tags, service ontology, sparql python, vertical search engines, web blogs, blog rdf, cms semantic, dbpedia vs freebase, hyperdata, natural language processing semantics, ping the semantic web, python semantic web, rdf and microformats, semantic search engines, semantic search example, semantic web services, web object oriented, wikipedia question, wordpress semantic web, information extraction, international semantic web conference 2009, list of vertical search engines, microformats, microformats versus rdf, natural language processing, natural language processing wikipedia, object oriented web page, semantic conference 2008, semantic conference 2009, semantic web conferences 2008, semantic web conferences 2009, semantic web feed, semantic web video, social semantic web, w3c logo, web introductions, webblogs, evolution of semantic web, iri semantic web, issues in semantic web, language question, natural language question answering system, on whose vision is the semantic web concept based, oracle data storage, protege 4.0 tutorial, protege ontology, rdf versus microformats, search engines, search semantic web, semantic data storage, semantic web reference, service, web 3.0 opportunities, web services life cycle, aperture semantic, backlink blog, blog semantics, falcons semantic, hl, introduction of semantic web, leave a comment, legs blog, list of blogs, microsoft semantic web, natural language processing semantic, problem of semantic web, problem semantic web, protege tutorials, rdf blogs, rdf review, semantic web 101, semantic web conferences, semantic web natural language, semantic web podcast, semantic web searches, semantics is, service life cycle, service ontologies, vertical search engines list, web conference 2008, wikipedia natural language processing, arc semantic web, blog natural language processing, european semantic web 2008, foaf search, international semantic web conference, international semantic web conference 2008, introduction to semantic, iswc 2008, life cycle of web services, metadata extraction and tagging service, microformats tags, microsoft sparql, object oriented web pages, owl vs rdf, semantic news aggregator, semantic web 2009, semantic web algorithm, semantic web evolution, semantic web game, semantic web layer cake 2008, semantic web service, semantic web sites, service modeling, spanish semantic, sparql in php, tassilo pellegrini, the nature of selfishness, the semantic web is not a separate web but an extension, tutorial protege, camps semantics, eswc 2008 conference, eswc 2008 semantic web, falcons semantic web search engine, freebase, lowell vizenor, metadata extraction, natural language question, nature of selfishness, object oriented web site, oracle semantic store, owl rdf, pagead2.googlesyndication.com, problems of the semantic web, protege 4, rdf vs. microformats, search engines semantic web, semantic logo, semantic markup tags, semantic web searching, semantic web tools, spanish language semantics, starting a revolution, swoogle.com, tag rdf, the semantic web vision, web service lifecycle, wikipedia question answering, arc php, arc rdf php, blogs semantic web, dbpedia, focus, folktologies, microformats vs. rdf, mining tags, ontology, open calais python, podcast semantic web, problem in semantic web, protege introduction, rdf semantic web, search engine for semantic web, selfishness of mankind, semantic problems, semantic updates, semantic web algorithms, semantic web and search engines, semantic web feeds, semantic web part 4, semantic web vs web 2.0, service lifecycle, stochastic search, storage in oracle, using protege, weaving thread, web 3.0 blog, web technology topics, webservice lifecycle, zeitguiest, blog information extraction, blogs on semantic web, camp semantic, conference semantic web 2008, cross pollination wikipedia, eswc conference 2008, eswc tenerife, ftp p2p, information extraction open source, introduction semantic web